Making Mealtime Meaningful: Discover how we're giving back with the 12T Cares program →

The practice of deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them — a practice we call “trolling” — is still running rampant on social media platforms,

Trolling is not constructive. It does not add to the sense of community. Its sole purpose is to threaten, upset, or intimidate others online.

Nearly as long as they have been around, social media companies have turned a blind eye to this problem. And it’s seemingly only gotten worse as the pandemic has brought more and more people online.

Online trolling has increased since early 2020.
Online trolling has increased since early 2020.

“We are swimming in a cesspool of misinformation,” Jevin West, an associate professor within the Information School at the University of Washington told Forbes. “The pandemic likely makes it worse because increased levels of uncertainty creates the kinds of environments that trolls take advantage of.”

“It would make sense that the pandemic is making trolling behavior worse and widespread,” said Dr. Kent Bausman, a professor in the Online Sociology program at Maryville University.

Trolling is defined as deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response.
Trolling is defined as deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response.

“The overall intensity of this negative event is one current generations have never experienced,” Kent said. “When you couple this with the additional and simultaneous negative event of skyrocketing unemployment, you have the perfect brew for an escalating collective negative mood. This is what spurs trolling. It is a grotesquely cathartic individual level response to the negative feelings produced by an event(s). I say grotesquely in that relief or pleasure is gained by victimizing and harassing another for their difference in opinion or feeling.”

Online trolls can target anyone, but they have been especially cruel to high-profile individuals who tend to have more followers than the average user, including athletes and celebrities.

Anyone can be targeted by online trolling.
Anyone can be targeted by online trolling.

Sports Illustrated detailed thew case of one college basketball referee who was targeted by a wave of nearly 3.500 death threats after video of his contested calls went viral online.

“I was at [Higgins’s] office for one and a half hours,” said Sheriff’s investigator Matt Barrall. “and three different phone lines literally never stopped ringing. It was like that for three days straight.

Social media analysis group Demos looked at 80,000 randomly chosen social media accounts and over a three-week span counted more than 200,000 “aggressive tweets.”

One study on social media trolling found more than 200,000 “aggressive tweets
One study on social media trolling found more than 200,000 “aggressive tweets” were made over the course of 3 weeks.

A separate study conducted jointly by Stanford and Cornell looked at comments on CNN’s website. The study found that the messages that had been flagged for abuse were typically posted late at night or early in the work week, when studies show that people are most likely to be in a foul mood.

According to The Guardian, Twitter users have been historically cruel to athletes in the UK. Mario Balotelli, of Liverpool, was sent more than 8,000 discriminatory posts on social media, more than half including racist rhetoric. Danny Welbeck, after moving to a different team, received 1,700 abusive posts, half which used racially charged language. Daniel Sturridge was sent about 1,600 discriminatory posts, more than 60% disparaging his sexual orientation.

Social media platforms actually benefit from online trolling because it means users are online.
Social media platforms actually benefit from online trolling because it means users are online.

Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube are some of the most popular social media platforms in existence. None of them have terms of service which ban trolling outright. Twitter’s own top lawyer has admitted the company has been “inexcusably slow” in fighting off vicious online abuse, Business Insider reports.

One potential reason: social media platforms actually benefit from online trolling. This is because the storms that arise from this type of behavior boost overall ‘time spent online’ – which is a core metric for social media platforms, Econsultancy reports.

If the internet is to be the democratizing force it was dreamed of becoming, these social media sites must provide a safe space for people to share their views without resorting to intimidation through trolling.

Trolling is nothing more than cruel anti-social behavior. Click below and ask Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to revise their terms of service to ban trolling.